Man accused of throwing drink at Cook County State's Attorney Kim Foxx

In a shocking incident, Cook County State's Attorney Kim Foxx was allegedly assaulted near a residence in south suburban Flossmoor on Friday. The accused, identified as William D. Swetz, 34, of Flossmoor, has been charged with aggravated battery in a public place and aggravated assault with a deadly weapon, as per Cook County court records. The altercation reportedly occurred when Swetz threw a brown liquid substance from a drink cup onto Foxx's face while she was on the parkway of the road, seated in a GMC truck. He further allegedly reversed his vehicle across the road and accelerated towards Foxx, prompting her to step off the road onto the parkway grass out of fear of being hit. Kim Foxx, who made history as the first Black woman to be elected to the state's attorney's office in 2016, has been a controversial figure during her tenure. Criticism has been directed towards her office's charging decisions and her handling of high-profile cases, including those involving disgraced singer R. Kelly. The incident in Flossmoor adds to the challenges she has faced in her role as the county's top prosecutor. Foxx's dedication to her position and the obstacles she has encountered have been under scrutiny, with this recent assault further highlighting the pressures she navigates in her professional capacity. The alleged assault on Foxx has raised concerns about the safety and security of public officials, especially those in high-profile positions. The incident serves as a reminder of the risks faced by individuals in public service roles and the importance of ensuring their protection. Authorities are investigating the matter further to determine the motives behind the attack and to ensure that appropriate measures are taken to prevent similar incidents in the future. As the legal proceedings unfold, the community awaits updates on the case and the implications it may have on both Foxx and Swetz. The incident has sparked discussions about the need for increased security measures for public officials and the potential consequences for individuals who engage in violent acts against those in positions of authority. The outcome of this case will likely have broader implications for the safety protocols surrounding public figures and the consequences for those who threaten their well-being.