Tim Walz’s military peers criticize him as a habitual liar

Tim Walz, who served in the National Guard from 1981 to 2005, has faced significant criticism regarding his military service record, particularly after joining Kamala Harris's campaign. His departure from the National Guard occurred shortly before his unit was notified of a potential deployment to Iraq in March 2005, raising questions about his commitment to his soldiers. Retired military personnel, including Command Sergeant Major Paul Herr, have labeled him a 'habitual liar,' asserting that he misrepresents his service. Herr's comments were echoed by other veterans who felt let down by Walz's decision to leave the National Guard as his unit prepared for deployment. The controversy intensified when Walz filed paperwork to run for Congress in March 2005, just a month before his unit's deployment notice. His campaign maintained that he was dedicated to serving his country, whether in Washington or Iraq. However, critics argue that his actions suggest a prioritization of political ambitions over military duty. The timeline of his retirement paperwork remains unclear, but it typically requires at least 90 days for processing, further complicating the narrative surrounding his exit from military service. Republican Senator JD Vance has also criticized Walz, accusing him of dodging deployment and labeling his political career as 'stolen valor garbage.' In response, Walz's campaign has defended his military service, highlighting his 24 years of dedication and commitment to veterans and military families. The ongoing debate reflects broader tensions in political discourse regarding military service and accountability. As the election approaches, Walz's military record continues to be a focal point of contention, with implications for his candidacy and public perception. The criticisms from his peers in the National Guard may resonate with voters who value military service and integrity, potentially impacting his campaign's success.