Public Sentiment on Immigration and the Harris-Walz Ticket
- Newt Gingrich criticizes Harris-Walz on their immigration policies.
- Gingrich highlights American opposition to open borders and illegal immigration.
- Public not in favor of tax dollars supporting illegal border crossings.
A recent analysis highlights a significant disconnect between the American public's views on immigration and the positions of the Harris-Walz ticket. Many Americans express strong opposition to open borders and illegal immigration, with Vice President Kamala Harris's stance—suggesting that illegal border crossings should not be criminalized—drawing particular criticism. Her previous calls for a reevaluation of border patrol practices have also raised concerns among constituents who favor stricter immigration enforcement. Polling data reveals that a substantial majority of Americans, approximately 83 percent, support local law enforcement's authority to detain illegal immigrants arrested for other crimes. Furthermore, a notable 70 percent advocate for declaring a state of emergency at the border, with a preference for deploying FEMA and National Guard resources to address the ongoing crisis. This widespread discontent with current immigration policies is seen as a driving force behind the perceived need for the Democrats and media to rebrand the Harris-Walz ticket as moderate. The opposition to voter identification requirements further illustrates the gap between Democratic positions and public opinion, with 85 percent of Americans favoring photo ID requirements for voting. This sentiment underscores a broader trend of resistance to the pro-illegal immigration values associated with the Harris-Walz campaign. As the political landscape evolves, Republicans are urged to counter the media's portrayal of the Harris-Walz ticket. However, the challenge remains for them to effectively communicate their stance and break through the prevailing narrative, especially as the election approaches.