Controversy over Jordan Chiles' Bronze Medal
- Court of Arbitration for Sport ruled against Jordan Chiles' appeal for the bronze medal.
- Dispute arose after Chiles' score was initially raised to the bronze position but then revoked for being filed too late.
- Suggestions made for Chiles to share the bronze medal with two Romanian gymnasts.
U.S. gymnast Jordan Chiles has expressed her discontent with the International Olympic Committee's (IOC) decision to strip her of her bronze medal, labeling it "unjust." This ruling followed a successful appeal by the Romanian Gymnastics Federation, which resulted in Ana Barbosu being awarded the bronze. Chiles, who initially celebrated her medal after the Paris Olympics, has faced a barrage of racially charged attacks on social media, which she condemned in a heartfelt statement on Instagram. The controversy began when Chiles' coach filed an appeal regarding her score, which had initially placed her in fifth. However, the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) ruled that the appeal was submitted four seconds past the one-minute deadline, leading to the reinstatement of her original score of 13.666. Despite USA Gymnastics claiming to have evidence that the appeal was timely, the CAS upheld its decision, prompting the IOC to officially reallocate the medal. In light of the ongoing dispute, the Romanian Gymnastics Federation has proposed a solution that would see all three gymnasts—Chiles, Barbosu, and Sabrina Maneca-Voinea—share the bronze medal. This suggestion aims to resolve the conflict while honoring the athletes involved. Meanwhile, Chiles has indicated her determination to continue fighting for justice, stating that she will not give up despite the setbacks. As the situation unfolds, both Chiles and Barbosu have expressed their desire for fairness in the sport, with Chiles taking a break from social media to protect her mental health amid the turmoil.