Adam Kinzinger claims Trump threatens Jan. 6 panel members
- Adam Kinzinger highlighted the embarrassment Trump felt due to the January 6 committee's findings.
- Kinzinger expressed his indifference to Trump's threats against committee members.
- The committee's work aimed to uncover the truth about the insurrection, despite opposition from Trump.
In a recent television interview, Adam Kinzinger, a former Republican representative from Illinois, discussed his experiences as a member of the House select committee investigating the insurrection on January 6, 2021. He expressed that the committee's findings were likely to embarrass Donald Trump, particularly as they outlined his actions, or lack thereof, during the violent events that unfolded at the U.S. Capitol. Kinzinger emphasized that the committee was operating under the directives of Congress and remained committed to uncovering the truth about the insurrection.Kinzinger mentioned that Trump had shown outrage toward the committee's work, which he took as a sign of Trump's embarrassment over the revelations regarding his inaction during the critical 187 minutes when violence escalated. Kinzinger articulated his belief that Trump's threats against committee members were an attempt at intimidation, framing them as misguided and ineffective. He conveyed a sense of pride in following through on their investigative responsibilities while rejecting any notion that Trump could instill fear in him or other committee members.In a related context, former Representative Liz Cheney echoed Kinzinger's sentiments, arguing that Trump's rhetoric was part of a broader assault on the rule of law. She pointed out that Trump's claims about the committee deleting evidence were False and illustrated a continuation of his disregard for democratic principles. Trump Falsely suggested that members of Congress involved in the investigation should face criminal penalties for their roles in shedding light on his unlawful actions during the lead-up to and on January 6. Kinzinger's remarks serve as a critique of Trump's response, showcasing how it highlights the discord between his actions and the expectations of accountability in American democracy.