Alec Baldwin faces dismissal as crucial evidence destroyed, defense argues

In a high-profile case involving actor-producer Alec Baldwin, his defense attorneys are seeking to dismiss an involuntary manslaughter trial related to the fatal shooting of a cinematographer during a rehearsal for the movie "Rust." The defense argues that the firearm involved in the shooting was heavily damaged during FBI forensic testing, potentially compromising crucial evidence that could exonerate Baldwin. The trial is scheduled to begin next month, with New Mexico Judge Mary Marlowe Sommer set to hear arguments on the matter. Prosecutors plan to present evidence at the trial indicating that the firearm was in proper working condition before the shooting and could not have fired without the trigger being pulled. Armourer Hannah Gutierrez-Reed, who was convicted of involuntary manslaughter for her role in the incident, received an 18-month prison sentence. The defense contends that the destruction of the firearm during testing has hindered their ability to mount a proper defense, as they are unable to conduct their own examination of the weapon. During a recent hearing, Judge Marlowe Sommer denied prosecutors' request to compel testimony from Gutierrez-Reed using immunity. The defense also sought to dismiss the trial on the grounds that Baldwin was not aware of the potential risks associated with the gun containing live ammunition. The judge is expected to rule on the motion to dismiss soon, with the trial scheduled to last eight days, starting on July 10th. Despite the damage to the firearm during testing, prosecutors argue that the defense still has sufficient evidence to present their case. They maintain that the gun parts are still available for examination and that the defense has other means to question the evidence. The upcoming trial is anticipated to be a high-profile affair, with Baldwin expected to appear in person as the proceedings unfold.