- Pope Leo XIV's lung cancer is localized and requires no further treatment after surgery.
Fernandes substituted in 67th minute
Bruno Fernandes was substituted off in the 67th minute during the match against Como.










































View all Military Conflicts news
View all Entertainment news
View all Sport news

Bruno Fernandes was substituted off in the 67th minute during the match against Como.
Como defeated Manchester United 4-1 in a Champions League match at their home stadium in Como, Italy.
The decision from the staff was not to press man-to-man, which left space and allowed Como to play comfortably.
We did half press man-to-man in the second half and conceded a goal from that, so the tactics were not the main issue.
The performance was unacceptable and I take full responsibility for it.
I have not given my position any thought; my focus is on the supporters and the club.
Michael Carrick apologized to Manchester United supporters for the team's performance after the loss to Como.
Slide 1 of 5

01 General knowledge
Israel's security policy has been defined for decades by the confrontation with Iran and its regional allies, a rivalry that intensified after the October 7, 2023, Hamas attack and the subsequent wars in Gaza, Lebanon, and Iran. The 2026 US-Israeli military campaign against Iran, which began on February 28, lasted 108 days and ended with a memorandum of understanding, but many of its original objectives remained unfulfilled. That inconclusive outcome left Iran's leadership intact and its regional influence partially preserved, reinforcing Israel's view that military pressure must continue. The broader Middle East remains a 'powder keg,' as Russian officials have warned, with the risk of catastrophic escalation still present.
The Abraham Accords of September 2020, which normalized relations between Israel and several Gulf Arab states, were supposed to bring peace but instead fueled a new era of military cooperation against Iran. Israel established a secret military outpost in Iraq to support its air campaign, and Gulf states have faced Iranian retaliation on their energy infrastructure. The war has shifted the burden of conflict onto Iran and its proxies, while Israel's economy has remained resilient, with its defense exports surging. This larger arc of confrontation, rather than any single election, now shapes the region's security landscape.
02 The subject
Israel's security doctrine, as described by regional policymakers and analysts, now rests on three pillars: breaking Iran, holding buffer zones beyond Israel's borders, and using force to deter enemies. This doctrine has been hardened by the October 7, 2023, attacks and the subsequent wars, making military force the preferred tool in dealing with adversaries. The doctrine is not tied to any single leader; it is a national consensus that transcends party lines. Understanding this doctrine is essential to see why the upcoming election is unlikely to change Israel's fundamental strategy toward Iran, military force, and Palestinian statehood.
03 Explained
Israel's parliamentary elections use a proportional representation system, where voters choose party lists rather than individual candidates. Seats in the 120-seat Knesset are allocated based on the percentage of the national vote each party receives, with a minimum threshold to enter parliament. Because no single party has ever won a majority, coalition governments are the norm, and smaller parties often hold outsized influence in negotiations. This system means that the election outcome can hinge on a few pivotal seats, as seen with the Arab-led parties that could decide the next government.
04 Previous developments
The October 7, 2023, Hamas attack, which killed about 1,200 people in Israel, triggered a massive military offensive in Gaza that has killed tens of thousands of Palestinians. That attack and the subsequent wars in Gaza, Lebanon, and Iran have hardened Israeli public opinion, pushing many voters, especially first-time voters, toward the right. A poll found that 74% of first-time voters identify as right or center-right, a higher proportion than the general public. The election on October 27, 2026, is now seen as a referendum on Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's hard-right coalition, with opposition leader Gadi Eisenkot challenging him.
In the lead-up to the vote, the Israeli military announced a significant reinforcement of its forces across all fronts, citing a heightened risk of escalation during the sensitive period. The military chief warned that the army was on high alert and ready to launch large-scale offensive operations. Meanwhile, the Palestinian Authority postponed its own legislative elections to September 2027, citing worsening conditions, which further dims prospects for Palestinian political renewal. These developments set the stage for an election that may change the leader but not the underlying security strategy.
05 The environment
As the election approaches, Israel faces a volatile security environment. The military has reinforced its forces on all fronts, and Defense Minister Israel Katz has warned Hezbollah against joining Iran in an attack. Cross-border hostilities with Hezbollah have been limited since the June ceasefire, but Israeli forces maintain control over a zone in southern Lebanon. In Gaza, the Israeli military controls more than 60% of the territory and continues to carry out strikes, despite international calls for restraint.
The political environment is equally charged. Netanyahu's coalition has granted ultra-Orthodox men exemptions from military service, a source of resentment among reservists. The opposition, led by Eisenkot, has focused on Netanyahu's failure to prevent the October 7 attack. Meanwhile, US President Donald Trump has withheld his endorsement from Netanyahu, citing the prime minister's weak polling position and disagreements over regional conflicts. Arab-led parties, representing about 20% of Israel's population, could play a pivotal role, but major Jewish-led parties have ruled out forming a coalition with them, raising the possibility of political deadlock.
06 Why this happened
The reason the election is unlikely to change Israel's strategy lies in the deep public consensus that has formed since October 7, 2023. The attack and the subsequent wars have convinced most Jewish Israeli voters that military force is the only reliable way to deal with threats, and that Palestinian statehood is not a viable option. As Palestinian analyst Ghassan al-Khatib put it, 'The substance of the policy remains the same: No to a Palestinian state and yes to further settlement expansion. On this, they are all in agreement.'
This consensus is reinforced by the political dynamics of the election. Parties across the spectrum are competing to project harder-line positions, as public opinion has moved further to the right. Even a government led by Netanyahu's opponents would likely seek to repair Israel's international standing by curbing some settler violence or pursuing settlement expansion with less fanfare, but the underlying policy direction would remain unchanged. The real divide among Israeli parties is one of degree rather than direction—how aggressively to fight wars, how far to expand settlements, and whether any leader opts for diplomacy.
07 Facts and events
The election's outcome will have significant consequences for Israel's international standing. Netanyahu faces an arrest warrant from the International Criminal Court, and the war in Gaza has isolated Israel internationally. A change in leadership could help repair some of that damage, but the underlying policy direction is unlikely to shift. The election also has implications for the region: some Gulf leaders see Netanyahu as the Israeli politician most likely to keep Iran under pressure, even as they oppose his expansionist policies.
For Palestinian citizens of Israel, the election feels existential. They face discrimination, soaring crime rates, and threats of displacement, and many are mobilizing to vote for the first time. The Abraham Initiatives has recorded over 175 crime-related killings in Arab communities this year, highlighting the state's perceived neglect. The exclusion of Arab parties from coalition talks could lead to political gridlock, potentially triggering another round of elections. The stakes are high, but the strategic direction seems set.
08 Questions answered
The main reason is the deep public consensus formed after October 7, 2023, that military force is the only reliable tool and Palestinian statehood is not viable, a view shared across the political spectrum.
Arab-led parties could win enough seats to help decide who becomes prime minister, but major Jewish-led parties have ruled out forming a coalition with them, potentially leading to deadlock and another election.
The postponement of Palestinian legislative and presidential elections to September 2027 leaves current leaders unchallenged and further undermines the Palestinian Authority's legitimacy, while the EU and France have expressed regret.
Slide 1 of 5
























Slide 1 of 3
Choose the stories that matter to you—and how you want to see them.