- Trump announced no military strikes on Iran before November 3 elections.
AP-NORC poll conducted
AP-NORC conducted a survey of 2,140 US adults from September 24-28, 2026, finding that 64% think AI is developing too quickly.





































View all Military Conflicts news
View all Entertainment news
View all Sport news

AP-NORC conducted a survey of 2,140 US adults from September 24-28, 2026, finding that 64% think AI is developing too quickly.
President Trump announced that executives from six leading AI developers agreed to a set of voluntary safety principles, including working with independent auditors.
Reuters/Ipsos conducted a six-day online survey of 4,506 US adults, including 3,526 registered voters, ending on October 5, 2026.
Congress has so far failed to agree on legislation setting guardrails on AI, and lawmakers are expected to be away from Washington until after the midterms.
Senator Bernie Sanders and Steve Bannon, from opposite political poles, both called for federal action on AI, but little has come so far.
The Trump administration has not taken AI risks seriously enough or at all.
Congress has not taken AI risks seriously enough or at all.
AI is a major threat to American workers.
The government should impose stricter regulations on AI.
AI could get out of control and risk the future of humankind.
The US government should not use AI to determine the target of a military strike.
The government should limit the construction of data centers that power AI.
AI and data center construction are vital to US competitiveness, and without them the US tech industry will fall behind China.
The Trump administration's priority is to ensure a booming economy so workers have many opportunities and limited volatility from short-term disruptions, and America continues to lead the world on AI.
The more pressing concern with AI is that it could cost people their jobs or threaten human health and safety, not the existential risk.
Rafael Batista, a Johns Hopkins fellow, commented that AI chatbots can entrench existing views and suggested users hide personal preferences to limit bias.
Slide 1 of 5

01 General knowledge
Aaron Sorkin's 2010 film The Social Network told the story of Facebook's founding, focusing on Mark Zuckerberg's early days at Harvard and the lawsuits that followed. That movie became a cultural touchstone, shaping how many people viewed the company and its CEO. Over the following sixteen years, public perception of Facebook and its parent company Meta shifted dramatically as concerns grew about data privacy, election interference, and the platform's effects on mental health. Sorkin's new film, The Social Reckoning, is a direct sequel that moves from the company's origin to its modern consequences, dramatizing the 2021 Facebook whistleblower scandal.
The original film was made when Sorkin said he knew about Facebook 'the way I've heard of a carburetor,' a remark that highlighted how new the platform was at the time. By contrast, the sequel arrives in a period when Meta faces legal challenges, including a New Mexico trial over accusations that it failed to protect children from addiction and exploitation. The new movie is part of a broader cultural reckoning with social media's impact, as governments and experts debate how to regulate platforms that many now see as harmful. This larger story of growing distrust and legal pressure provides the backdrop for the casting changes and creative decisions behind The Social Reckoning.
02 The subject
Aaron Sorkin is the Oscar-winning screenwriter of The Social Network and the creator of The Social Reckoning, a sequel that examines Facebook's role in fostering extremism and divisiveness. His perspective on the company has evolved significantly since the first film, as he now aims to address the platform's current implications rather than just its invention. Sorkin began contemplating the sequel around 2019, the same year he wrote a New York Times op-ed directed at Mark Zuckerberg, expressing concerns about the platform's influence. This critical viewpoint has shaped the narrative of the new film, which he hopes will entertain audiences while provoking thought about serious social issues.
03 Explained
Jeremy Strong is known for his immersive method acting, a technique where actors stay in character even when cameras are not rolling. For The Social Reckoning, Strong remained in character as Mark Zuckerberg during filming, speaking in a different voice, walking differently, and avoiding socializing with other cast members. Director Aaron Sorkin informed the cast of Strong's approach, and the results were praised. This method has been controversial; a 2021 New Yorker profile highlighted Strong's intense dedication, leading to public comments from his Succession co-star Brian Cox, who called the method 'f***ing annoying' but praised Strong as a wonderful actor.
04 Previous developments
When Sorkin began developing The Social Reckoning, he initially reached out to Jesse Eisenberg, who had portrayed Zuckerberg in The Social Network, to reprise the role. Sorkin spent three days trying to convince Eisenberg, but the actor declined, citing personal reasons and a desire to move in different directions in his life. Eisenberg expressed admiration for Sorkin but said he no longer wants to be associated with the character. Jeremy Strong, known for his role in Succession, was then cast as Zuckerberg, bringing his method acting approach to the part.
Strong contacted Zuckerberg after being cast to express his serious approach, and Zuckerberg responded, though the content of that response was not disclosed. During filming, Strong defended Zuckerberg, and after his last shot, he broke character to tell Sorkin that he would have defended Jeff Horwitz if he had played that role. The film also stars Mikey Madison as Frances Haugen and Jeremy Allen White as Jeff Horwitz, the Wall Street Journal reporter who received the leaked documents. The Social Reckoning is set to be released on October 9, sixteen years after The Social Network.
05 The environment
The release of The Social Reckoning comes at a time when Meta is facing intense legal and regulatory pressure. In New Mexico, prosecutors are using depositions from Zuckerberg and Instagram leader Adam Mosseri as evidence in a trial accusing the company of violating consumer protection laws by failing to address social media addiction and child exploitation risks. Zuckerberg has also testified in a Los Angeles courtroom, denying that Instagram deliberately targets children, while internal documents suggest otherwise. These legal battles are part of a broader wave of scrutiny, with experts and governments calling for stronger regulation of social media platforms.
In Australia, Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has met with Apple's Tim Cook to discuss social media safety reforms, including a ban for under-16s that took effect in December. Canadian experts have published papers in the Lancet arguing that responsibility for protecting young people must shift from individuals to tech companies and governments. Meanwhile, Meta's own AI initiatives have drawn criticism, with some questioning the company's track record on promises. This environment of distrust and legal challenge forms the backdrop for a film that dramatizes the whistleblower scandal, reflecting a society grappling with the consequences of the digital age.
06 Why this happened
Jesse Eisenberg's decision to decline the role was not about money, according to Sorkin, who noted that the actor is concerned about raising his children with too much wealth. Eisenberg, in a separate interview, said he no longer wants to be associated with the character of Zuckerberg, emphasizing that his decision was not a reflection of the film's quality, which he believes will be wonderful. Sorkin respected Eisenberg's decision, acknowledging that their conversations brought him closer to changing his mind than he initially thought possible. The actor's personal reasons and desire to move in different directions in his life ultimately outweighed the opportunity to reprise a career-defining role.
07 Facts and events
The Social Reckoning dramatizes the 2021 Facebook Papers scandal, where former employee Frances Haugen leaked internal documents revealing that Facebook knew its platforms, especially Instagram, could harm teenagers' mental health. The film's release comes as Meta faces a potential $18 billion penalty related to claims that its platform endangered children. This legal and cultural pressure highlights the ongoing consequences of the whistleblower's actions, which have fueled lawsuits and public distrust. The film is one of several cultural highlights this week, as audiences continue to grapple with the digital age's impact on society.
08 Questions answered
Eisenberg declined because he no longer wants to be associated with the character of Zuckerberg, citing personal reasons and a desire to move in different directions in his life.
The film dramatizes the 2021 Facebook whistleblower scandal, where Frances Haugen leaked documents revealing the company's prioritization of profits over public health.
Strong used method acting, staying in character during filming, speaking in a different voice, and treating co-stars as he imagined Zuckerberg would.
Slide 1 of 5
























Slide 1 of 3
Choose the stories that matter to you—and how you want to see them.