Jon Stewart criticizes Biden and Trump's debate performance, calls for the use of performance-enhancing drugs

In a scathing critique following the first presidential debate of the 2024 election, Jon Stewart, known for his satirical commentary, hosted a live episode of The Daily Show. Stewart did not hold back, criticizing both President Joe Biden and former President Donald Trump for their performances during the debate. He called out Trump for his lies and Biden for his stumbling and lackluster attacks on Trump, particularly on the topic of abortion. Stewart humorously suggested that both candidates should consider using performance-enhancing drugs to improve their debate skills. During the debate, Biden's performance was heavily scrutinized, with observations of him appearing frail, struggling to finish sentences, and losing his train of thought. Stewart highlighted the contrast between the two candidates' performances and humorously remarked on the need for better debate preparation, especially for being on camera. Behind the scenes, there are rumblings of discontent with Biden's performance, with calls to replace the 81-year-old president on the ticket after his lackluster showing against Trump. Stewart's commentary extended to critiquing the debate rules set by CNN and the overall hype surrounding the contest. He pointed out the low standards he perceived for the candidates, with Trump needing to "appear normal" and Biden needing to "remain upright." Stewart's sharp wit and biting humor were on full display as he dissected the debate moments and the candidates' responses, providing a satirical take on the political spectacle. As the debate unfolded, Stewart's commentary resonated with viewers as he highlighted the absurdity and shortcomings of the candidates' performances. His remarks on the need for better debate preparation and the potential use of performance-enhancing drugs added a comedic yet critical perspective to the post-debate analysis. Overall, Stewart's critique encapsulated the disappointment and frustration felt by many watching the debate, emphasizing the need for more substantive and engaging political discourse in the election cycle.