Former Northeastern University lab manager convicted of staging hoax explosion at Boston campus and lying to federal agents
- Former lab manager at Northeastern University convicted of staging hoax explosion and lying to federal agents.
- The individual was found guilty on three counts by a federal jury.
- The incident took place at the Boston campus.
In a recent development, a former lab manager at Northeastern University, Jason Duhaime, has been found guilty of orchestrating a fake explosion at the Boston campus and subsequently providing false information to a federal agent. The 46-year-old from San Antonio, Texas, was convicted on three charges by a federal jury, potentially facing up to five years in prison and a fine of $250,000 for each offense. This verdict comes after two attorneys representing Duhaime withdrew from the case earlier this year, with a public defender taking over. The incident unfolded in September 2022 when Duhaime reported to university police that an explosion occurred when he opened a package, causing injuries to his arms. This led to a significant law enforcement response, including the evacuation of the area and the deployment of a bomb squad. However, further investigation revealed inconsistencies in Duhaime's account, with evidence suggesting that he had fabricated the entire scenario, including injuries and a threatening letter found on his computer. FBI Boston Special Agent in Charge Joseph Bonavolonta emphasized the serious repercussions of such bomb hoaxes, stating that they instill fear and distress in communities. The note left by Duhaime contained menacing language, warning of potential future violence if certain actions were not taken. Authorities highlighted the importance of holding individuals like Duhaime accountable for their actions, particularly in light of the increasing prevalence of bomb threats in various public spaces. Duhaime is set to be sentenced on October 2, with the court proceedings shedding light on the severity of his actions and the impact of false threats on public safety. The case serves as a reminder of the consequences associated with perpetrating hoaxes that disrupt peace and security, underscoring the need for vigilance and swift action in addressing such incidents to maintain community well-being and trust in law enforcement.