Jul 3, 2024, 11:34 AM
Jun 29, 2024, 11:58 PM

Backlash over Pat Tillman Award for Prince Harry

Subjective
Highlights
  • A petition was launched to stop Prince Harry from receiving a sports award for veterans.
  • Prince Harry is set to receive the Pat Tillman Award for his work with the Invictus Games.
  • Controversy grows as the award honoring war hero Pat Tillman is given to Prince Harry.
Story

In a controversial turn of events, more than 30,000 individuals have signed a petition opposing Prince Harry's receipt of the prestigious Pat Tillman Award from sports network ESPN. The award, named after American war hero Pat Tillman, is intended to recognize individuals who embody Tillman's values of dedication to their squad and country. The petition, initiated by Patti Mickel, argues that Prince Harry's past actions, including controversies related to military disclosures and endangering his squadron, make him an unsuitable recipient for such an esteemed honor. Prince Harry, 39, was selected for the award due to his efforts in utilizing sports to create positive change and inclusivity for marginalized communities, particularly through his work with the Invictus Games. However, critics, including Tillman's mother Mary, have expressed disappointment in the decision, citing other more deserving individuals within the veteran community who lack the privilege and resources that Prince Harry possesses. Mary Tillman emphasized that the award should be bestowed upon individuals who truly reflect its intent and honor Pat Tillman's memory. ESPN defended their choice to honor Prince Harry, stating that his work with the Invictus Games Foundation aligns with the award's purpose of promoting healing through sport for military service members and veterans worldwide. Despite the accolades Prince Harry received for his military service in Iraq and Afghanistan, critics argue that his actions, such as publicly disrespecting his family and controversies surrounding his military service, make him unworthy of the Pat Tillman Award. The decision has sparked debate over the selection process and the significance of honoring individuals who truly embody the values of the award.

Opinions