Kamala Harris Has More Billionaires Prominently Backing Her Than Trump—Bloomberg Reportedly Gives Another $50 Million To Help Harris (Updated)
- At least 100 billionaires are supporting either former President Donald Trump or Vice President Kamala Harris, with a larger number backing Harris.
- Prominent billionaires such as Warren Buffett, Mark Zuckerberg, and Bill Gates have chosen not to endorse any candidates openly during this election cycle.
- The financial backing for Harris reveals significant support from high-profile donors, indicating a shift in billionaire allegiances compared to past elections.
In the lead-up to the 2024 U.S. presidential election, a significant number of billionaires, approximately 100, are publicly backing either Donald Trump or Kamala Harris. Reports indicate that a majority of these affluent supporters are aligning with Harris, signifying a notable trend among the nation's wealthiest individuals. This cycle has seen substantial financial commitments directed toward Harris's campaign, with over 82 billionaires contributing to her support, reflecting her growing appeal in affluent circles. Interestingly, despite their historic influence in political contributions, several prominent billionaires have refrained from endorsing either candidate publicly. Figures like Warren Buffett and Mark Zuckerberg have taken a step back from the election fray, instead delivering comments on the importance of non-partisanship. Bill Gates has also voiced similar sentiments, showing caution in his political statements while having ties to Republican and Democratic donors alike through various philanthropic endeavors. The current political environment reveals an intriguing juxtaposition: while Harris garners considerable billionaire backing, Trump's support is notable as well, illustrated through massive contributions from wealthy individuals. This financial dynamic suggests a competitive and possibly shifting allegiance among America's elite as they navigate the complexities of contemporary electoral politics. Ultimately, this election cycle underscores the evolving landscape of financial support in U.S. politics, where historical loyalties might be challenged by the emerging priorities of wealthy constituencies, signaling potential long-term implications for both parties moving forward.