Newsmax CEO Aired False Claims About 2020 Election, Smartmatic Says

In a pre-trial hearing for Smartmatic's defamation lawsuit against Newsmax, attorney Erik Connolly presented evidence suggesting that Newsmax CEO Chris Ruddy was aware that the network lacked evidence to support claims of election rigging involving Smartmatic. Connolly referenced an internal email from Ruddy dated November 12, 2020, where he stated, “We have no evidence,” highlighting that some network employees privately doubted the allegations being aired. Despite acknowledging the absence of evidence for widespread voter fraud, Ruddy defended Newsmax's decision to cover claims made by former President Trump and his allies. He stated, “We have reported on significant evidence of widespread election irregularities and vote fraud,” which Smartmatic has denied. This contradiction raises questions about the network's editorial integrity and its responsibility in reporting unverified claims. Misha Tseytlin, representing Newsmax, countered Smartmatic's assertions, arguing that the network was merely presenting both sides of the story, as directed by Ruddy. He emphasized that there was no evidence to suggest that Newsmax knowingly disseminated false information. The network maintains that its coverage is protected under the First Amendment. The outcome of this case could have far-reaching implications for journalistic practices, particularly regarding the coverage of election-related misinformation. Unlike Fox News, Newsmax issued a clarification in December 2020, stating it had found no evidence of vote manipulation by Smartmatic or Dominion, despite claims made by some guests. The company continues to deny any wrongdoing.