Rupert Murdoch's trust request denied amid allegations of bad faith
- Commissioner Edmund Gorman dismissed Rupert Murdoch's proposal to alter his family trust on December 7, 2024.
- The request aimed to enhance his son Lachlan Murdoch's control over family media assets.
- The court deemed the request as lacking good faith and detrimental to equitable family distribution.
In the United States, a significant legal ruling occurred on December 7, 2024, when Nevada Commissioner Edmund Gorman halted Rupert Murdoch's attempt to modify his family trust. The trust, originally crafted during his marriage to Anna Murdoch, was designed to distribute power and assets among Rupert's children, namely Lachlan, Elizabeth, and James, ensuring equal financial stakes and voting shares. Rupert Murdoch's request aimed to favor his eldest son, Lachlan, preparing for his eventual succession and solidifying Lachlan's control over Fox News Media. The court determined that Rupert's request was not made in good faith and was instead a strategic move to alter the trust arrangement to bolster Lachlan's future influence. Commissioner Gorman described the attempt as an effort to “stack the deck” in favor of Lachlan, underscoring that it represented a divergence from the intended equitable distribution initially established in the trust. The court's decision, documented in a sealed ruling, emphasized the importance of adhering to the established agreements made during Rupert's marriage to Anna. During the ruling, Gorman articulated that the request, if granted, would lead to an inevitable consolidation of power, diminishing the stakes of Rupert’s other children and possibly impacting the editorial direction of Fox News Media towards a stronger right-leaning perspective. He likened the legal proceedings to a poker game, suggesting that while deceptive maneuvers might seem likely to succeed, the truth would ultimately prevail in the courtroom. Following the ruling, Rupert’s legal team expressed intentions to appeal the decision. This case raises significant questions about inheritance, family legacy dynamics, and the ethical considerations surrounding trust modifications, particularly for someone as influential as Rupert Murdoch. It not only sets a precedent regarding family trust modifications but foreshadows ongoing tensions within the Murdoch family concerning the future control of their media empire.