Sep 11, 2024, 6:45 PM
Sep 11, 2024, 12:00 AM

Megyn Kelly accuses Disney"s ABC News of election interference

Provocative
Right-Biased
Highlights
  • Megyn Kelly criticized ABC News moderators for their bias against Donald Trump during a presidential debate.
  • Dana Walden, a Disney executive and friend of Kamala Harris, oversees ABC News and has been accused of influencing the debate's moderators.
  • Kelly's comments highlight concerns about media impartiality and the potential impact on the electoral process.
Story

During a recent presidential debate, moderators David Muir and Linsey Davis from ABC News displayed a noticeable bias against former President Donald Trump, which has drawn criticism from Megyn Kelly. Kelly highlighted the influence of Dana Walden, a Disney executive and close friend of Kamala Harris, who oversees ABC News. She accused Walden of orchestrating the moderators' actions to undermine Trump, suggesting that they were attempting to 'steal' the election. Kelly expressed her disappointment in the moderators, stating they acted in accordance with their boss's wishes. Walden's connections to Harris have raised concerns about potential conflicts of interest, especially since she has hosted fundraisers for Harris and donated significantly to the Democratic Party. Critics argue that this relationship compromises the integrity of ABC News, particularly during a politically charged event like a presidential debate. Kelly pointed out that the moderators failed to challenge Harris with the same rigor they applied to Trump, further illustrating the perceived bias. The scrutiny of ABC News is not new; the network has faced backlash in the past for spreading misinformation about Trump. This history, combined with the current debate's dynamics, has led to accusations of partisanship. Kelly's remarks reflect a growing sentiment among some commentators that media outlets are not fulfilling their role as impartial observers in the political arena. As the election approaches, the implications of such biases could have significant consequences for public perception and trust in media coverage, potentially influencing voter behavior and the overall electoral process.

Opinions

You've reached the end