Daniel Penny faces trial over Jordan Neely chokehold death
- Daniel Penny was accused of causing the death of Jordan Neely through a chokehold on a subway train in May 2023.
- The jury acquitted Penny after deliberating on charges of manslaughter and criminally negligent homicide.
- The case raises ongoing debates about mental health, public safety, and the implications of vigilante justice.
In May 2023, Daniel Penny, a 26-year-old former Marine, was involved in a fatal encounter with Jordan Neely, a 30-year-old homeless man, on a New York City subway. Neely was reportedly making alarming comments and gesturing aggressively, which led Penny to intervene. He placed Neely in a chokehold for approximately six minutes, an act that was recorded by bystanders. Neely later died as a result of this restraint, which multiple medical experts testified was a chokehold leading to asphyxiation. The case stirred significant public debate regarding vigilante justice, mental illness, and the overall safety of subway riders amidst rising tensions around public health and crime in urban environments. Penny faced charges of second-degree manslaughter and criminally negligent homicide, as the prosecution argued that he used excessive force and failed to recognize Neely was no longer a threat after he stopped moving. The defense maintained that Penny acted to protect other passengers and believed his actions were justified given Neely's erratic behavior. Witness testimonies varied, with some expressing relief during the incident while others insisted that Penny had overstepped the constraints of self-defense. After a controversial and closely watched trial, the jury concluded deliberations and ultimately acquitted Penny of the more severe charges. The case highlights the growing concern over mental health issues in public spaces, the perception of safety among transit riders, and the moral implications of intervening in potentially dangerous situations. Penny's acquittal has ignited further discussions about systemic issues behind homelessness and mental illness, as well as the responsibilities citizens bear when confronted with such dilemmas. The incident and trial unfolded against a backdrop of heightened scrutiny surrounding race and policing, especially notable in light of previous high-profile incidents of violence against Black individuals. Penny, who is white, and Neely, who was Black, were at the center of conversations on race relations and the varying perceptions of justice in similar cases. This case continues to resonate within the larger societal debates about how best to handle mental health crises in public settings and the legal ramifications of self-defense claims.