USAID raises major concerns over GHF's ability to deliver aid safely

In the days leading up to a $30 million aid pledge from the United States, USAID officials expressed serious doubts regarding the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation's (GHF) effectiveness in delivering food to Palestinian civilians in Gaza. A government review highlighted safety and oversight issues related to GHF's proposed plans, questioning the ability of the group to avoid putting aid recipients in harm's way. These concerns were documented in a 14-page report, which was allegedly not shared with GHF prior to funding approval, raising questions about transparency in the decision-making process and whether senior leadership had adequately reviewed the report. The USAID review pointed out several gaps in GHF’s application, including missing details about the operational plans and lack of clarity regarding the distribution locations. Furthermore, reviewers noted inconsistencies in the timelines and requested further information on logistical arrangements for distributing essential supplies, including infant formula, which could pose health risks without proper guidelines since Gaza suffers from unsafe drinking water. The GHF's bid for $30 million was part of a more extensive $100 million budget aimed at expanding operations from four to eight aid sites, but the review indicated that the group had not satisfactorily demonstrated how the funding would specifically support this expansion. Despite these significant criticisms, GHF claimed that USAID’s inquiries were a standard part of the application process, asserting their intention to address all raised questions as required by regulations. GHF has faced scrutiny surrounding its operations in Gaza, with accusations that its activities have endangered civilians by potentially exposing them to Israeli military actions. The United Nations has labeled GHF’s operations as problematic, stating that they resulted in widespread harm among those seeking aid, including reports of injuries and fatalities among civilians. GHF has defended its aid delivery efforts, insisting on their effectiveness and asserting that they are a necessary alternative to the current aid distribution systems, which they consider ineffective. Support for GHF has also come from the U.S. government and Israeli officials, who have reportedly commended the organization for effectively delivering millions of meals to Gaza’s population during a time of severe hunger. A State Department spokesperson reiterated support for GHF, emphasizing the need to ensure that aid reaches those in need without becoming a tool for Hamas to divert resources. However, the ongoing controversy around the effectiveness and safety of GHF’s operations in Gaza raises significant questions regarding future collaboration and the challenges faced in humanitarian aid distribution within conflict zones.