Trump claims he can fire National Portrait Gallery director

In late May 2023, President Donald Trump announced on Truth Social his intention to terminate Kim Sajet, the director of the National Portrait Gallery, which is part of the Smithsonian Institution in the United States. He accused Sajet of being a 'highly partisan person' and a strong supporter of diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives, which he deemed inappropriate for her position. The Smithsonian, established as an independent institution, emphasized that personnel decisions are made by its secretary, not the president, reinforcing its nonpartisan stature. This incident occurred amidst Trump's broader strategy to reshape cultural institutions to align with his political perspectives. The Smithsonian Board of Regents, composed of notable figures such as Chief Justice John G. Roberts and Vice President JD Vance, emphasized its commitment to ensuring that the institution remains free from political influence. They clarified that all personnel decisions regarding museum directors are ultimately under the domain of the Smithsonian’s secretary, Lonnie G. Bunch III. Following Trump's announcement, sentiments within the museum community reflected disbelief and concern about the potential political ramifications for artistic institutions and their independence from government influence. The board was already in the process of reviewing Sajet’s performance and Trump's accusations before any action could be taken. Trump's past actions against various independent agencies and bodies, as well as a previous executive order targeting exhibits he described as promoting divisive ideologies, indicated his intention to impose his framework on national cultural narratives. Critics warned that capitulating to Trump’s demands may set a precedent that would compromise the independence of the Smithsonian's museums, turning them into politically influenced entities. Trump’s claimed interference in such institutions raises concerns regarding the balance between governmental oversight and institutional autonomy. Cultural leaders within the museum sector expressed alarm over Trump's directives, fearing that any willingness to align with the president’s perspectives might undermine the mission of preserving and interpreting American history free of political bias. As the situation evolves, the operational structure and leadership of the Smithsonian Institution come under scrutiny, highlighting the continued tension between cultural integrity and political influence.