Oklahoma Oil Industry Wants Refunds from Cleanup Fund
- Oklahoma oil industry seeks refunds from cleanup fund.
- Drillers opting out of the fund resulted in significant loss for orphan well sites.
- Refunded money could have restored around 1,500 orphan well sites.
Oklahoma's oil and gas sector is under scrutiny for its participation in a voluntary fund aimed at cleaning up orphan wells, which are abandoned sites that pose environmental hazards. While the industry promotes its commitment to environmental stewardship through a 0.1% assessment on production, many of the state's largest companies have opted out, resulting in millions of dollars in refunds that could have been used for restoration efforts. A recent analysis by ProPublica and Capital & Main highlights that these refunds could have facilitated the cleanup of an additional 1,500 orphan well sites. The Oklahoma Energy Resources Board, established in 1993, oversees the fund, which is intended to address the environmental impact of orphan wells. Despite the board's efforts, the decision by some companies to request refunds has hindered its ability to restore damaged land. Zack Taylor, a spokesperson for the Oklahoma Energy Producers Alliance, acknowledged the board's significant work but suggested that participation should be optional, allowing smaller producers to decide whether to contribute. Mindy Stitt, executive director of the Energy Resources Board, defended the industry, stating that many companies contribute millions to the cleanup programs, even if they occasionally request refunds. However, critics argue that if the fund remains voluntary, companies should be mandated to allocate sufficient resources for plugging their own wells, given the wealth they derive from state resources. Notably, Ovintiv, a major player in the industry, received over $3.8 million in refunds, raising concerns about the sustainability of the fund and the industry's commitment to environmental responsibility. As discussions continue, some companies are advocating for changes that could further limit contributions to the fund, complicating efforts to address the state's orphan well crisis.