Oct 24, 2024, 10:21 AM
Oct 24, 2024, 10:21 AM

Lidia Thorpe's Possible Disqualification from Parliament Explained

Provocative
Highlights
  • Lidia Thorpe, an independent senator in Australia, raised concerns regarding her parliamentary eligibility due to a potential misstatement of her Senate oath.
  • Thorpe claimed she swore loyalty to 'the Queen's hairs' instead of 'the Queen's heirs,' a statement that has prompted criticism from political opponents, including Simon Birmingham.
  • The ongoing debate may lead to a High Court ruling on her qualifications, potentially affecting her position in the Senate.
Story

In Australia, the political climate surrounding Senator Lidia Thorpe intensified following her controversial comments during a parliamentary event on October 21, 2024. Thorpe interrupted a reception for King Charles III, publicly denouncing the monarch and claiming she swore loyalty to 'the Queen's hairs' instead of the official oath which is to 'the Queen's heirs.' This incident has ignited a political storm, as opposition leaders question the validity of her oath and eligibility to sit in the Senate. The federal Coalition’s inquiry into Thorpe's qualifications highlights concerns regarding the oath of allegiance that all Senators must take to confirm their position. Simon Birmingham, the opposition Senate leader, pointed out that if Thorpe did not properly take the oath, it could compromise her ability to legally participate in Senate proceedings. Thorpe’s comments drew further criticism, with Birmingham likening her situation to members of Sinn Fein who have similarly refused loyalty pledges. Amidst the backlash, Thorpe defended her statements to the media, asserting she only articulated what was written on the card she was given, which contributed to a debate over her legitimacy in Parliament. Constitutional law experts have indicated that the High Court may need to determine Thorpe's eligibility, possibly leading to her expulsion. The ongoing situation encapsulates broader discussions in Australia about political accountability, representation, and the implications of parliamentary oaths, emphasizing the seriousness of her claims and the potential consequences for her political career.

Opinions

You've reached the end