Tory councillor gives bizarre excuse after wife jailed for horrific tweets during far
- Lucy Connolly was imprisoned for 31 months for inciting racial hatred through social media posts after the Southport attacks.
- Her remarks, viewed over 310,000 times, contributed to civil unrest and violence in various locations.
- The case highlights the serious consequences of hate speech in an increasingly divisive social climate.
In the United Kingdom, Lucy Connolly, the wife of a Tory councillor, was sentenced to 31 months in prison for inciting racial hatred following the Southport attacks on July 29, 2023. Her social media posts advocated for violence against hotels housing asylum seekers, which were seen by over 310,000 users before being deleted. The judge emphasized that her comments contributed to serious disorder and violence across several areas. Connolly, who had no prior criminal record except for a driving incident, expressed remorse and claimed she would appeal her sentence. The statement made by Connolly included disturbing remarks about mass deportation and direct threats to immigrants and the government. In court, prosecutors revealed that her tweet disregarded the tense atmosphere following tragic events in Southport, ultimately leading to broader societal unrest. Connolly's defense highlighted her tragic personal history, referencing the loss of her child, which the defense argued might have influenced her mental state and actions. Judge Melbourne Inman criticized Connolly's actions, stating they represent a dangerous attempt to exploit civil unrest for divisive and hateful purposes. He underscored the court's duty to counter such incitements with significant penalties. The implications of this case underline the delicate balance between freedom of expression and the responsibilities that accompany it, particularly in the context of rising tensions related to asylum seekers in the UK. As the story unfolds, support from Cllr Raymond Connolly for his wife's appeal indicates ongoing family struggles, suggesting the case may attract further media attention, particularly concerning its implications for local politics and social cohesion.