Google lawyer advises Kamala Harris for Trump debate amid antitrust concerns

A prominent lawyer from Google, Karen Dunn, played a dual role recently by defending the tech giant in a federal trial while simultaneously advising Kamala Harris for her debate against Donald Trump. This unusual situation has raised ethical concerns among antitrust experts, who fear that Dunn's influence could lead to lenient outcomes for Google in ongoing legal matters. Dunn's involvement in the Harris campaign has been criticized by various political figures, who argue it undermines the integrity of the Justice Department's case against Google. Dunn, a top litigator at Paul Weiss, is tasked with defending Google against a lawsuit that poses a significant threat to its business model. Her rapid transition from the courtroom to the campaign trail has drawn attention, particularly as it coincides with the Biden-Harris administration's legal actions against the company. Critics argue that this relationship could compromise the administration's stance on antitrust issues, potentially favoring a settlement that avoids breaking up Google's market dominance. The controversy surrounding Dunn's dual roles has sparked discussions about the ethical implications of such close ties between legal representatives and political campaigns. Some experts have expressed concern that this could lead to a lack of accountability for Big Tech companies, as political figures may be swayed by their advisers' connections to these corporations. As the debate over antitrust regulations continues, the situation highlights the complexities of navigating relationships between government officials and private sector lawyers, raising questions about the future of regulatory actions against powerful tech firms like Google.