Vance Questions Walz's Military Service Amid VP Race

Tim Walz, recently selected as Vice President Kamala Harris' running mate, faces scrutiny over his military service record, particularly regarding his decision to leave the Army National Guard just before his unit was deployed to Iraq in 2005. Critics, including fellow GOP veterans, have accused Walz of "shameful" behavior for abandoning his unit, with some questioning the authenticity of his claims about his military experience. This controversy has intensified as Walz's opponents seek to define his character and qualifications ahead of the upcoming election. Vance, a prominent critic, highlighted discrepancies in Walz's statements about his military service, particularly in relation to gun control remarks where Walz referenced weapons he used in combat. Vance pointed out the irony of Walz's claims, given that he did not serve in Iraq, having retired from the National Guard two months before his unit received deployment orders. This has led to accusations of "stolen valor," with critics demanding clarity on Walz's military history. In response to the allegations, Walz's campaign has defended his record, emphasizing his rise to the rank of command sergeant major and his 24 years of service in the National Guard. They argue that he retired to focus on his congressional campaign, citing the Hatch Act's restrictions on political activities for federal employees. However, the timing of his retirement and the subsequent deployment of his unit has raised questions that could impact his political future. As the campaign unfolds, Walz's military service will likely remain a focal point, with both supporters and detractors using his record to shape public perception. The ongoing debate reflects broader themes of honor and accountability in military service, particularly in the context of political leadership.