Woman jailed for Falsely claiming £34,000 in Universal Credit
- Frederika Gazova claimed £34,870 in Universal Credit over 28 months by faking employment.
- She provided falsified documents to support her claim, including a payslip from a non-existent job.
- Gazova was sentenced to nine months in jail, reflecting the seriousness of welfare fraud.
In the United Kingdom, a significant case of welfare fraud involved Frederika Gazova, a 26-year-old woman from Leeds. Over a period of 28 months, between February 2020 and June 2022, Gazova fraudulently claimed a total of £34,870 from the Department of Work and Pensions (DWP). She Falsely claimed to be employed in a cleaning department at a business in Harehills, but investigations revealed that this job did not exist and the business was unaware of her claims. To support her fraudulent application, Gazova provided falsified documents, including a payslip that attempted to validate her claims of employment. The prosecutor, John Batchelor, detailed the systematic nature of Gazova's deceit, explaining that while the business itself was legitimate, it had no record of Gazova being employed there. This misrepresentation led to a lengthy investigation, as the DWP reviewed her claims and the evidential documents submitted. The court was informed that despite acknowledging her wrongdoing, Gazova displayed a misunderstanding of the severity of her actions, as she continued the fraudulent activities for an extended period. As the case unfolded in Leeds Crown Court, a probation worker indicated that Gazova had expressed remorse and had already returned £500 of the misappropriated funds. It was also noted that she now has no income and her family relies on her partner's Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment (PIP) benefits, highlighting the financial strain her actions have imposed. In the courtroom, mitigating circumstances were presented by defense attorney Danielle Graham, who pointed out that Gazova was still young, a mother of two, and had previously maintained a good character. However, the fact remains that her fraudulent activities led to severe legal repercussions, including a nine-month custodial sentence. The case exemplifies the ongoing issue of welfare fraud, particularly in how individuals navigate the complexities of benefit systems. The consequences of such fraudulent claims not only affect the individual but can impact the wider social system by diverting funds meant for vulnerable groups in society.