CNN calls pre-recorded Kamala Harris interview “live” during broadcast

Recently, Vice President Kamala Harris participated in a much-publicized interview with CNN commentator Dana Bash, which was promoted as her first sit-down with the media. However, this interview was actually pre-recorded and not live, despite CNN branding it as such during the broadcast. This discrepancy raised questions about the authenticity of the event and the motivations behind its presentation. Critics have pointed out that this incident reflects a broader pattern of perceived inauthenticity surrounding Harris's campaign and public persona. The interview was conducted alongside Minnesota Governor Tim Walz, further complicating the narrative as it was framed as a significant media engagement. Instead, it was described as a propagandized conversation rather than a genuine interview, leading to skepticism about the intentions of both Harris and Walz. The fact that the entire interview was not aired added to the concerns regarding transparency and honesty in political communication. This situation has drawn attention to CNN's credibility, which has been questioned in recent years. By labeling a pre-recorded segment as live, the network has faced criticism for potentially misleading viewers. This incident exemplifies the ongoing challenges in media integrity and the relationship between political figures and the press. Ultimately, the portrayal of the interview raises important questions about the nature of political discourse and the role of media in shaping public perception. Critics argue that such tactics are indicative of a broader strategy to manipulate public opinion rather than to inform and educate the electorate.