Trump slams Leonard Leo over judicial nominations advice

In the United States, President Donald Trump attacked Leonard Leo, a prominent conservative legal activist, on May 29, 2025. This incident came after a three-judge panel ruled against Trump's tariffs, declaring most of them illegal. Historically, Leo had advised Trump on judicial nominations, playing a crucial role in shaping the conservative majority on the Supreme Court during Trump's first term. Trump's relationship with Leo soured when the appointed judges did not support his claims regarding the election results and tariffs. Notably, this outburst reflects Trump's broader dissatisfaction with the judiciary, which has been pushing back against his administration’s policies. The President's harsh words on social media included calling Leo a "sleazebag" and suggesting he probably hates America. Trump explained that he initially sought advice from the Federalist Society, of which Leo was a leading figure, because he was new to Washington politics. This remark came as a significant departure from his previous endorsements and praise for Leo and the Federalist Society, an organization he credited with some of his most significant achievements during his tenure. Rather than acknowledging the contributions Leo made and the judiciary's overhaul under his administration, Trump's comments indicate a deepening rift between himself and those who were once his allies. Leonard Leo, in contrast, maintained a more composed response, expressing gratitude for his role in transforming the federal judiciary and emphasizing that it has never been in better shape in modern history. His calm demeanor amid the escalating tensions suggest his reliance on maintaining relationships with influential figures is crucial to his ongoing efforts in the conservative legal movement. Despite the turmoil, Leo's comments underscore the importance of judicial appointments he helped facilitate for Trump's administration, which he views as a lasting legacy. The fallout from Trump's comments could have significant implications for both his ability to navigate future judicial nominations and the strength of his relationship with the Federalist Society. The organization's vast network of conservative legal professionals may now be wary or hesitant about their involvement with Trump given his public denunciation of Leo. As the political landscape evolves, this shift could result in a more challenging pathway for Trump to identify and nominate judges aligned with his agenda for a potential second term, leading to critical consequences for the future of conservative judicial influence in America.