Prince Harry challenges UK decision on downgraded security protection
- Prince Harry's legal challenge focuses on the downgrade of his security detail in February 2020 when he moved to the U.S.
- Shaheed Fatima KC argues that the decision-making process was flawed and not comparative to other VIP treatment.
- The outcome of this appeal could significantly impact how security for royals is handled in the future.
In the UK, Prince Harry is undergoing legal proceedings as he contests the British government's decision to strip him of his publicly-funded security detail. This change occurred in February 2020 when Harry stepped down as a full-time member of the royal family and relocated to the United States with Meghan, Duchess of Sussex. His legal representative, Shaheed Fatima KC, asserts that Harry has been subjected to unjustified and inferior treatment compared to other royals. In court, Fatima argued that the Royal and VIP Executive Committee, known as Ravec, failed to follow its own procedures in deciding Harry's security status. The court hearings have revealed alarming threats faced by the Duke of Sussex, including a publicized call by al-Qaeda for his assassination. Additionally, there have been incidents, including a dangerous car chase involving paparazzi in New York, highlighting Harry's ongoing safety concerns. Fatima maintains that Harry's case should have been evaluated according to the same standards applied to other individuals categorized as VIPs, given his unique position as a high-profile figure who remains at risk due to historical threats and ongoing media scrutiny. Despite the High Court's previous ruling that deemed the ruling to downgrade his security as lawful, Harry's legal team believes that significant procedural oversights occurred during the assessment process. Fatima emphasized that the failure to complete a risk management board assessment, which should evaluate the threat level to an individual, has left Harry in an exposed position whenever he is in the UK. She has asserted that this lack of assessment goes against the established protocol designed to ensure the safety of public figures. The court hearings are not only crucial for determining Harry's future security arrangements but also raise broader questions regarding the safety and treatment of royals and high-profile public figures in the UK. As these proceedings continue, the atmosphere remains tense, with the media and public closely observing Harry's fight for what he and his team argue is a fundamental right to safety. The judges have begun weighing the arguments presented and may emit a written decision soon as they explore these complex issues of security protocol concerning the UK aristocracy.