UN General Assembly votes to demand Gaza ceasefire and aid access
- The UN General Assembly will vote on a resolution addressing the humanitarian crisis in Gaza.
- The resolution demands a ceasefire, hostages' release, and aid access after a previous failed attempt in the Security Council.
- With no vetoes in the assembly, the resolution is expected to pass overwhelmingly, reflecting global concern for the humanitarian situation.
The United Nations General Assembly, consisting of 193 member states, is scheduled to cast a vote on a resolution concerning the humanitarian crisis in Gaza. The resolution is aimed at initiating an immediate ceasefire, facilitating the release of hostages held by Hamas, and ensuring the safe passage of humanitarian aid through Israeli border crossings. This vote is particularly significant as there are no vetoes in the assembly, unlike the U.N. Security Council where a previous resolution calling for a ceasefire failed due to a veto from the United States. The U.S. argued that the previous resolution did not adequately address the issue of hostages. This new resolution, drafted by Spain, highlights the urgency for humanitarian access and condemns any form of starvation of civilians as a method of warfare. Additionally, it references a March order from the International Court of Justice for Israel to enable the transit of essential supplies into Gaza, reinforcing Israel's obligations as an occupying power under international law. Despite opposition from Israel and the U.S., the resolution reflects a substantial global concern for the humanitarian situation in Gaza and emphasizes a commitment to finding a two-state solution to the ongoing Israeli-Palestinian conflict. The resolution has gained momentum amidst reports of a blockade that has significantly limited aid to Gaza and ongoing violence that has hampered aid distribution efforts, which are managing to provide some food assistance despite hostilities. The assembly is also preparing for a high-level meeting aimed at promoting discussions on the two-state solution, although Israel has expressed discontent with such initiatives. Notably, the resolution does not include condemnation for Hamas' attacks that initiated the current conflict, which is a key demand from the United States, illustrating the complex dynamics and differing perspectives surrounding this ongoing conflict. The situation continues to evolve with the hope that international intervention can ease the humanitarian crisis in Gaza.