Shaun Murphy criticizes Ronnie O'Sullivan's chalk choice after shock defeat
- Shaun Murphy raised concerns about Ronnie O'Sullivan's use of Triangle chalk after his defeat.
- Murphy suggested that Triangle chalk could make players more error-prone compared to Taom chalk.
- O'Sullivan acknowledged his loss to Barry Hawkins and accepted responsibility for his performance.
In the UK Championship, Ronnie O'Sullivan faced a surprising first-round defeat to Barry Hawkins, which sparked discussions about his equipment choices. O'Sullivan's long-time rival, Shaun Murphy, raised concerns about O'Sullivan's use of Triangle chalk, suggesting it may have contributed to his performance issues during the match. According to Murphy, players using Triangle chalk are more prone to making errors compared to those who use the more widely adopted Taom chalk. He explicitly mentioned that he had previously advised O'Sullivan to switch away from the Triangle brand, citing concerns about it making shots feel 'kicky'. During his matchup against Hawkins, O'Sullivan initially seemed to be in control of the game, leading 4-2. However, a crucial missed shot shifted momentum in favor of Hawkins, who capitalized on O'Sullivan's mistakes to secure the win. After the loss, O'Sullivan acknowledged his performance and gave credit to Hawkins for playing a good game, stating he had no complaints about the result. He noted feeling somewhat rusty but chose to leave comments on his performance to others, instead focusing on his usual game approach. Murphy's observations about O'Sullivan's chalk choice have highlighted a growing debate within the snooker community regarding the relationship between equipment and player performance, indicating that even top players might be impacted by the tools they elect to use. While O'Sullivan did not directly comment on the chalk issue after the match, Murphy's criticisms suggest that there are underlying complexities in professional snooker that go beyond mere skill and strategy. As players and commentators reflect on the importance of equipment choices, this incident may prompt further scrutiny on how different brands of chalk affect gameplay in professional snooker tournaments.