Nepal's army restores order after deadly protests force prime minister to resign

In Nepal, the recent spate of protests ignited by a government ban on social media escalated into severe violence, resulting in at least 34 fatalities and numerous injuries. Beginning on a Monday, the unrest centered in Kathmandu but quickly spread across the nation, leading protesters to set government buildings ablaze, including the parliament, amidst widespread anger against corruption. The Nepali military intervened to restore order just days after the upheaval began, patrolling the streets and issuing warnings against vandalism, looting, and arson. The protests were fueled by broader discontent with the government, particularly among the youth, who make up a significant portion of the population. They expressed outrage over the perceived disconnect between the government and the struggles of ordinary citizens, as social media platforms remained active and highlighted contrasts in lifestyles. Prime Minister KP Sharma Oli, facing mounting pressure, ultimately resigned in an attempt to facilitate a political resolution. Following his resignation, the situation remained fluid, with uncertainty surrounding the leadership and governance of the country. The military's involvement marks a significant occurrence, as it is usually reserved for natural disasters. This instance, however, reflects a growing trend of public dissatisfaction and demands for leadership that resonates with the populace, particularly the youth. General Ashok Raj Sigdel, the army chief, issued a call for dialogue among the conflicting groups to chart a path forward. As the nation grapples with the aftermath of these events, analysts suggest that a transitional arrangement will need to be quickly established to fill the political void. This presents a crucial challenge not only for the military but also for any potential interim government. The failure to establish a consensus on leadership raises questions about the future of governance in Nepal and the ongoing role of the military in political affairs. The lack of clear constitutional provisions for interim leadership complicates these tensions and highlights the need for a political solution that can bridge the divides among the populace.