Indiana woman threatens to kill Trump on social media

In the United States, an Indiana woman named Nathalie Rose Jones, age 50, has been arrested for making serious threats against President Donald Trump through her social media accounts. Federal authorities became aware of her actions when the U.S. Secret Service discovered her Instagram account, 'nath.jones', where she posted disturbing and threatening remarks about the President between August 2 and August 9, 2025. In her posts, Jones labeled Trump as a terrorist and accused his administration of causing unnecessary loss of life due to its handling of the COVID-19 pandemic, including their stance on vaccinations. The threats escalated when, on August 6, Jones publicly stated her willingness to 'sacrificially kill' Trump by disemboweling him. Following her alarming social media activity, she participated in a protest in Washington, D.C., on August 16, where she further expressed her disdain for Trump and his policies. During an interview with Secret Service agents after the protest, she admitted to making threats against the President, although she later claimed she no longer wished to harm him. Jones reportedly expressed a desire to avenge the lives lost during the pandemic, attributing them to the Trump administration. Following her statements, Jones was charged with threatening the life of the President and transmitting threats across state lines. U.S. Attorney Jeanine Pirro emphasized the seriousness of such threats, highlighting the swift action taken by law enforcement to protect the President and ensure justice. The case reflects underlying mental health issues that Jones herself acknowledged in her social media posts, where she spoke of her struggles with severe mental illness. This incident raises important questions about freedom of speech, mental health awareness, and the responsibilities of individuals when expressing their frustrations about political leaders on public platforms. The investigation is ongoing and serves as a reminder of the delicate balance between expressing dissent and making threats of violence.