Errol Musk claims Elon made mistake in Trump feud
- Errol Musk criticized the feud between his son and Trump as 'silly' and a result of stress.
- He believes that the conflict is based more on ego than policy differences.
- Errol thinks that the dispute will be resolved soon and expressed his support for Trump.
In a series of recent media appearances, Errol Musk, Elon Musk's father, expressed his views on the ongoing feud between his son and U.S. President Donald Trump. Speaking to multiple news outlets while visiting Moscow, Errol described the public exchange as a 'silly' dispute fueled by stress. He suggested that both Trump and Elon Musk have been under considerable pressure, which might have clouded their judgment and prompted the heated exchanges on social media. Errol aimed to downplay the conflict, emphasizing its trivial nature and predicting that it would soon be resolved. The altercation reportedly stemmed from a combination of political disagreements and personal insults, with Elon criticizing Trump's tax and spending policy as a 'disgusting abomination'. Errol Musk remarked that he believes the rivalry is more about ego than substantive policy issues. He also conveyed a hopeful message to his son, urging him to let the situation 'fizzle out'. Errol indicated that such tensions are common among influential figures who are once rivals. During his interview with Russian media, Errol conveyed his belief that Trump, having been elected by a significant majority, would ultimately 'prevail' in the interaction. He observed that public sentiment towards Trump in America remains overwhelmingly supportive, as noted from his recent three-week experience in the country. This perspective adds a layer of complexity to the family dynamics amidst a politically charged environment. The underlying factors contributing to this dispute include ongoing stress faced by both men due to their respective positions in society, and the high stakes involved in political and financial matters. Errol Musk's comments reflect a desire for reconciliation and understanding rather than prolonged conflict, suggesting that the issues at play are relatively insignificant, and that both parties should be allowed to move on peacefully without lingering tensions.