Aug 14, 2024, 12:00 AM
Aug 14, 2024, 12:00 AM

Hochul Advocates for Smartphone Ban in New York Schools with Local Flexibility

Left-Biased
Highlights
  • UFT president backs Gov. Hochul's initiative to ban smartphones in New York schools.
  • Union leader emphasizes the importance of districts having flexibility in implementing the ban.
  • The support from the powerful Teachers Union leader adds weight to the school phone ban proposal.
Story

New York Governor Kathy Hochul is advocating for a ban on smartphones in schools, emphasizing that individual districts should have the flexibility to tailor their implementation strategies. United Federation of Teachers (UFT) President Michael Mulgrew supports this approach, suggesting that districts should develop their own plans in consultation with parents. This engagement is crucial, as it allows schools to address community concerns effectively. Earlier this year, Hochul proposed the smartphone ban and has since conducted listening sessions with various stakeholders, including parents, teachers, and students. While Mulgrew believes that teachers favor schoolwide bans to alleviate enforcement burdens, Hochul has expressed skepticism about a district-by-district approach, indicating that it may not be effective. She has not yet detailed what a statewide ban would entail, but her comments suggest a preference for a more unified strategy. New York City Schools Chancellor David Banks had previously indicated plans for a similar policy in the city, but has since remained silent on its progress. Mulgrew pointed out that many city schools have had phone bans for years, primarily focused on discipline rather than addressing the broader issues of mental health and learning loss associated with smartphone use. He acknowledged the concerns of parents regarding emergency communication with their children, noting that schools with bans have established alternative contact methods. Mulgrew advocates for nuanced policies that allow older students to use devices for educational purposes while avoiding harsh disciplinary actions for phone possession.

Opinions

You've reached the end