Fulbright board resigns over Trump administration interference

On June 12, 2025, all 12 members of the Fulbright Foreign Scholarship Board announced their resignation in the United States, citing political interference from the Trump administration in the prestigious exchange program. The board members expressed deep concerns over the administration's actions, which they claimed usurped their authority by denying awards to a significant number of selected recipients for the academic year 2025-2026. This decision, they argued, undermined the program's merit-based selection process and its insulation from political influences, thereby threatening its integrity and credibility. The board further alleged that the Trump administration had initiated an unauthorized review of 1,200 already approved Fulbright award recipients, potentially leading to their rejection. In their public statement, the members indicated that such actions contradicted the Fulbright program's mission, which promotes international exchange and academic freedom—a goal that was articulated by Congress nearly 80 years ago when the program was established. The actions of the administration were viewed as contrary to the values inherent in the program, including free speech and academic freedom, as designated by the statutory framework. The board's resignation was seen as a last resort, reflecting their inability to continue serving in an environment where rules and regulations were being dismissed. They hoped that future Boards and legislative bodies would take steps to safeguard the program from further degradation or potential dismantling. They also raised legal objections on several occasions to senior officials but received no acknowledgment of their concerns, indicating a breakdown in communication and respect for the established guidelines of the program. This resignation marks a significant moment in U.S. diplomacy and education as the Fulbright program has traditionally functioned as a vital bridge in promoting mutual understanding across borders. The situation unfolds against a backdrop of increasing scrutiny of international students by the Trump administration, which has implemented tighter regulations and review processes, impacting the very foundation of the Fulbright's mission. The board's departure symbolizes not only a protest against specific administrative actions but also a broader warning against the implications of politicizing educational exchange and academic programs.