Moratorium on strikes against Ukraine's energy infrastructure ends amid rising tensions
- The US-brokered 30-day moratorium on energy strikes against Ukraine officially expired, confirmed by Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov.
- Peskov stated that Russia adhered to the moratorium, while accusing Ukraine of violating it multiple times.
- The expiration of the moratorium signals ongoing tensions and the complexities of achieving a lasting peace agreement.
In mid-March 2025, a limited ceasefire was agreed upon between Russia and Ukraine following a phone call between Russian President Vladimir Putin and US President Donald Trump. The conversation led to the establishment of a 30-day moratorium on strikes against Ukrainian energy infrastructure, brokered by the United States. However, this arrangement was marred by accusations from Russia claiming that Ukrainian forces violated the terms, undertaking over 120 strikes on energy targets within Russian territory during the period of the ceasefire. As the month dragged on, Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov confirmed that the moratorium officially expired, stating that as of that time, President Putin had not issued any new directives concerning military actions. Even with the expiration, Peskov characterized the limited ceasefire in a positive light, asserting that Russia adhered to the terms while simultaneously condemning Ukraine for its violations. The situation is compounded by a lack of trust, with Moscow emphasizing the need for reliable monitoring of any potential ceasefire. The Kremlin raised concerns about Ukraine's historical pattern of failing to comply with agreements. Additionally, they acknowledge the complexities of including foreign military assistance to Ukraine in negotiations, which Moscow believes undermines the peace process. In a statement reflecting the delicate negotiations, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio noted that Washington could withdraw from peace talks if significant progress is not seen in the immediate future. Moscow remains adamant about achieving a resolution to the conflict but recognizes that discussions are difficult, with both sides stuck in a cycle of blame and accusations.