L.A. County supervisors clash over government reorganization plans

On Monday, Supervisors Holly Mitchell and Lindsey Horvath presented opposing views to the county Democratic Party regarding Measure G, a proposed ballot measure aimed at restructuring L.A. County government. This measure, which is set for a vote on November 5, would significantly increase the size of the Board of Supervisors and introduce an elected chief executive to manage daily operations. Horvath, along with Supervisor Janice Hahn, supports the measure, arguing it would enhance voter influence over county governance. In contrast, Mitchell and Supervisor Kathryn Barger raised concerns about the potential for increased political infighting and the concentration of power in the hands of an elected chief executive. They argue that the current system, where the chief executive is appointed by the board, ensures accountability and reduces the risk of politicization. Mitchell specifically questioned the financial implications of expanding the board and creating a new ethics commission, suggesting that it could lead to cuts in essential county services. The debate highlighted a rare division among strong Democrats, with both sides presenting compelling arguments. Arcadia Mayor Michael Cao noted the unusual situation of having prominent party members on opposing sides of the issue. Supporters of the measure believe that an elected executive would empower voters, while opponents fear it could undermine the bureaucratic integrity of the position and strain county resources. As the Democratic Party deliberates on whether to endorse Measure G, the outcome will significantly impact the future structure and governance of L.A. County, reflecting broader tensions within the party about how best to serve constituents and manage county operations.