Chris LaCivita blames Trump's lies for January 6 violence
- In the aftermath of the January 6, 2021, attack on the US Capitol, several conservative figures, including Trump’s campaign manager Chris LaCivita, criticized the former president's role in inciting the violence.
- LaCivita shared posts on social media labeling the event an 'insurrection' fueled by Trump's falsehoods and expressed dismay at the actions taken that day.
- These statements contrast sharply with Trump's recent depiction of January 6, highlighting a significant divide within the Republican party regarding the events of that day.
On January 6, 2021, an unprecedented attack on the US Capitol unfolded as supporters of then-President Donald Trump stormed the building to disrupt the certification of Joe Biden's election win. In the immediate aftermath, numerous conservatives and some Republican leaders distanced themselves from Trump, placing blame on him for inciting the violence through misleading claims about the election being stolen. Among these figures was Chris LaCivita, Trump’s campaign manager, who openly condemned the day's events in a series of social media posts. LaCivita described the Capitol assault as an 'insurrection' and highlighted that it was fueled by baseless election lies propagated by Trump. His posts included sharing comments from former President George W. Bush, who described the assault as 'sickening' and a tragic consequence of leaders' reckless behavior. Some of LaCivita's posts have since been deleted, but they showcased a deep concern regarding the influence of false narratives on the day’s violent events. Further complicating the narrative, Trump has since attempted to recast the events of January 6, calling it a 'day of love and peace' and suggesting that he may pardon those prosecuted for their actions that day if he regains the presidency. This dissonance highlights the ongoing ideological rift within the Republican party about acknowledging the consequences of the Capitol riot. LaCivita’s actions serve as a noteworthy contrast to Trump’s portrayal, emphasizing a larger struggle within conservative circles to grapple with the events of that day and its implications for the future of the party.