House Republicans subpoena Nathan Wade for deposition this week
- Nathan Wade has been subpoenaed to testify about his involvement in the prosecution of Donald Trump.
- Despite confirming receipt of the subpoena, Wade failed to appear, prompting the House Judiciary Committee to seek help from the U.S. Marshals Service.
- The investigation raises questions about potential conflicts of interest and the use of taxpayer funds in the prosecution.
Nathan Wade, a Georgia-based lawyer, has been subpoenaed by the House Judiciary Committee to testify regarding his involvement in the prosecution of former President Donald Trump by Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis. Wade's relationship with Willis, which reportedly included romantic elements, has raised concerns about potential conflicts of interest, leading to his resignation from the case earlier this year. Despite confirming receipt of the subpoena, Wade failed to appear for the scheduled deposition, prompting the committee to enlist the U.S. Marshals Service to locate him. This unusual step reflects the committee's frustration with Wade's apparent attempts to evade service. The investigation into Wade is part of a broader inquiry into what House Republicans describe as politically motivated prosecutions. The committee is particularly interested in whether taxpayer funds, including federal grant money, were improperly used in the prosecution. Wade's financial dealings with Fulton County, where he reportedly earned nearly $700,000, are under scrutiny, especially given the nature of his relationship with Willis. Willis has defended her office's use of funds, asserting that all expenditures were appropriate and compliant with federal guidelines. The Georgia Court of Appeals is expected to rule on the implications of Wade's relationship with Willis, which could affect her ability to continue prosecuting the case against Trump and his co-defendants. As the situation unfolds, the committee's efforts to compel Wade's testimony highlight the ongoing tensions surrounding the prosecution of Trump and the political ramifications of the case. The outcome of this inquiry may have significant implications for both Wade and Willis, as well as the broader political landscape.