Sep 11, 2024, 12:00 AM
Sep 10, 2024, 2:52 PM

State Department faces GOP criticism for funding censorship groups

Provocative
Right-Biased
Highlights
  • The House Small Business Committee's report criticizes the State Department's GEC for funding censorship groups.
  • The investigation revealed that taxpayer dollars were used to support initiatives favoring certain businesses, undermining fair competition.
  • The report calls for legislative measures to prevent future funding to the GEC, highlighting concerns about censorship and media regulation.
Story

The House Small Business Committee has released a report criticizing the State Department's Global Engagement Center (GEC) for allegedly violating its mandate by funding groups that engage in censorship. This investigation, which has been ongoing for over a year, was prompted by reports on the GEC's financial support for the Global Disinformation Index (GDI), a British organization accused of pressuring advertisers to withdraw funding from right-leaning media outlets in the U.S. The report claims that taxpayer money has been used to support initiatives that favor certain businesses in the online marketplace, undermining fair competition. The GEC, established in 2016, has been collaborating with various government agencies and social media platforms to combat disinformation. However, the report argues that its actions have strayed from its intended international focus, particularly through its partnerships with domestic fact-checking organizations. The GEC's funding of the Institute for War and Peace Reporting, which in turn supported the Poynter Institute's International Fact-Checking Network, is highlighted as a significant example of this deviation. Furthermore, the report indicates that the National Endowment for Democracy (NED) has also breached international restrictions by working with fact-checking entities to evaluate domestic media organizations. This collaboration raises concerns about the role of government-funded organizations in influencing the credibility and funding of U.S. media outlets. In light of these findings, the report calls for legislative measures to prevent future funding to the GEC, emphasizing the need for transparency and fairness in the media landscape. The ongoing scrutiny of the GEC's activities reflects broader concerns about censorship and the implications of government involvement in media regulation.

Opinions

You've reached the end