Angela Rayner hires taxpayer-funded photographer amid sleaze controversy
- Angela Rayner has appointed Simon Walker as her Chief Photographer, making her the first deputy PM to have a taxpayer-funded photographer.
- This decision comes amid controversy over gifts received by senior Labour figures, including Rayner, from wealthy donors.
- The public's frustration over these gifts raises questions about the Labour Party's values and accountability.
Angela Rayner, the Deputy Prime Minister, has appointed Simon Walker as her Chief Photographer, with a salary of £68,000, amidst ongoing controversy regarding gifts received from Labour donors. This decision marks a significant moment as she is the first deputy to have a dedicated taxpayer-funded photographer, a role previously reserved for the Prime Minister. The move has drawn criticism, especially as it coincides with public anger over the acceptance of lavish gifts by senior Labour figures, including Rayner herself. Rayner has acknowledged the public's frustration regarding the gifts, which include clothes, holidays, and event tickets, stating that such donations have long been a part of political life. Despite the backlash, she maintains that she has not violated any rules and attributes some of the controversy to her transparency about the gifts. This situation has sparked discussions within the Labour Party about the appropriateness of accepting such donations, particularly during a time of austerity and cuts to public services. The appointment of a personal photographer is seen as part of Rayner's efforts to enhance her public image, which she refers to as 'Brand Angela.' However, her position has been complicated by the loss of certain responsibilities and the allocation of a prestigious residence to another Labour figure. The ongoing scrutiny of her actions and those of her colleagues raises questions about the party's values and its commitment to serving the public interest. As the Labour Party prepares for its conference, the internal dissent regarding the acceptance of gifts and the implications for party integrity may lead to significant discussions and potential changes in policy. The situation highlights the delicate balance between personal branding in politics and the expectations of accountability and transparency from public officials.