Swapping Shakespeare for working-class writers undermines aspirations
- Critics argue that prioritizing working-class writers can reinforce stereotypes.
- DH Lawrence's journey from a working-class background to literary success illustrates the potential for aspiration.
- The educational approach to literature may impact students' perceptions of their own literary potential.
In the context of educational discussions, there is a notable critique regarding current curriculum choices that prioritize the study of working-class writers over classical literature, such as Shakespeare. Proponents of this shift argue that it helps to create more relatable content for students. However, critics assert that this approach reinforces harmful stereotypes about working-class literature. A case in point is the life of DH Lawrence, who, despite his working-class roots in Nottinghamshire, became a renowned author. His literary journey was fueled by his desire to learn and improve himself, ultimately leading to the publication of 12 novels along with many other works. Lawrence's success challenges the notion that one's background should define their literary aspirations or capabilities.