Sep 19, 2024, 12:00 AM
Sep 19, 2024, 12:00 AM

New Hampshire enacts strict voter registration rules for noncitizens

Provocative
Highlights
  • New Hampshire's new law mandates proof of U.S. citizenship for first-time voters, such as a birth certificate or passport.
  • Critics warn that the law could confuse voters and disproportionately affect rural residents and college students.
  • The legislation reflects a trend of tightening voting regulations, addressing a perceived issue of noncitizen voting that lacks evidence.
Story

New Hampshire has enacted a law requiring first-time voters to provide proof of U.S. citizenship, such as a birth certificate or passport. This legislation, signed by GOP Governor Chris Sununu, is seen as a response to unfounded claims of noncitizen voting affecting election integrity. Critics argue that the law could confuse voters and disproportionately impact rural residents and college students who may lack the necessary documentation. Local election officials express concern that the new requirements could hinder voter participation. The law also eliminates exceptions for voters without proper identification, raising fears about its potential impact on turnout. While supporters claim it enhances election security, experts highlight that there is no evidence of widespread noncitizen voting in New Hampshire. The timing of the law's implementation has raised questions, as it may not take effect before the 2024 general election, leading to uncertainty among voters. New Hampshire's exemption from the National Voter Registration Act allows it to implement such requirements, unlike many other states. Legal challenges are anticipated, particularly regarding the law's compliance with the 14th Amendment, which prohibits imposing undue burdens on specific voter groups. Advocates for voting rights warn that the law could lead to increased litigation and potentially jeopardize the state's NVRA exemption. Overall, the new voter registration rules reflect a broader trend of tightening voting regulations in various states, often justified by claims of election fraud. However, many experts argue that these measures address a problem that does not exist, potentially disenfranchising eligible voters in the process.

Opinions

You've reached the end