Sep 10, 2025, 12:00 AM
Sep 10, 2025, 12:00 AM

BLS cuts nearly a million jobs from latest employment statistics

Highlights
  • The Bureau of Labor Statistics cut 911,000 jobs from its yearly job count due to emerging business formations.
  • The revisions indicate a disconnect between the BLS's models and the actual labor market trends.
  • The growing entrepreneurship points to an evolving economic landscape that may require updated data tracking methods.
Story

In the United States, the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) made a significant revision in its yearly job count, reporting a cut of 911,000 jobs. This revision was largely attributed to a surge in new business formations, indicating changes in the labor market that were not adequately captured in prior assessments. As the surge in entrepreneurship continued, it revealed discrepancies in the BLS's models, particularly the birth-death model that tracks job birth and loss among businesses. The benchmark revisions executed by the BLS reflect economic realities that differ from their earlier assumptions. Over the last two years, it has become apparent that the models may not be aligned with the dynamic growth of new businesses as they fail to account for the speed at which these ventures are born and die. Experts, including Heather Long, chief economist at Navy Federal Credit Union, have highlighted the rising applications for new business formations, emphasizing the impact of declining costs for new entrepreneurs, which encourages more individuals to explore the risks of starting their own businesses. Economists, such as those from Goldman Sachs, expressed concern over the BLS's monthly adjustments to payroll numbers, suggesting that the agency may have overestimated the stability and job creation capabilities of new businesses. The revisions indicate that the BLS's birth-death model may have been overly generous in forecasting the health of these new market entrants. As a result, the accuracy of ongoing employment statistics has come into question, raising issues regarding the BLS's ability to delineate a precise labor market picture amid shifting entrepreneurial dynamics. The long-term implications of these adjustments could lead to significant changes in how labor statistics are reported and interpreted. Continued discrepancies in the models highlight a pressing need for reevaluation and possible restructuring of statistical methodologies used by federal agencies. Ultimately, as entrepreneurship continues rising, understanding the true landscape of the labor market may require altering traditional metrics to ensure they align with current economic realities.

Opinions

You've reached the end