Labour plans to send failed asylum seekers to migrant hubs in the Balkans
- The UK government is exploring the establishment of overseas return hubs for failed asylum seekers, targeting countries in the western Balkans.
- This plan aims to address the significant rise in migrants arriving in the UK via small boats and expedite the asylum process.
- The proposal is seen as a shift from the contentious Rwanda scheme, but it may face legal opposition from refugee organizations.
The UK government has initiated discussions about establishing overseas return hubs for failed asylum seekers, particularly from countries deemed unsafe such as Iran and Somalia. These hubs are part of a strategy aimed at addressing the increasing number of migrants arriving via small boats across the English Channel. Early proposals include collaborating with nations in the western Balkans like Albania, Serbia, Bosnia, and North Macedonia, which could potentially serve as host countries for these return centers. This approach differs from the previously scrapped Rwanda scheme, which involved sending migrants to Africa without considering their asylum eligibility. Since early 2023, records indicate that over 5,000 migrants have crossed the Channel in small boats, signaling a significant rise in asylum claims and creating mounting pressure on the government to respond effectively. Keir Starmer's government plans to speed up the asylum processing system while simultaneously reducing overall net migration through these new centers. The proposal has garnered both support and criticism, with some lawmakers arguing that it acknowledges the flaws in the previous Rwanda plan. The UN's International Organisation for Migration has endorsed the concept of return hubs, suggesting technical assistance to ensure compliance with legal standards. However, there are anticipated legal challenges from refugee advocacy groups concerned about the implications for human rights and the treatment of asylum seekers in detention-like conditions. As the government plots a path forward, the effectiveness of this strategy remains to be seen, especially considering the growing dissatisfaction among local authorities concerning the financial burden of accommodating rejected asylum seekers.