Sep 28, 2024, 12:07 AM
Sep 28, 2024, 12:07 AM

Tennessee advocates drop federal lawsuit over redistricting maps

Highlights
  • A group of Tennessee civil rights advocates has decided not to pursue a federal lawsuit over alleged racial gerrymandering in the state's congressional maps.
  • The lawsuit was dismissed by a three-judge panel, which cited new standards from a recent Supreme Court ruling that complicates proving racial gerrymandering.
  • Despite this setback, the plaintiffs are committed to increasing voter participation in the upcoming elections, emphasizing the need to combat discrimination.
Story

A coalition of voting and civil rights advocates in Tennessee has decided not to refile a federal lawsuit challenging the state's congressional redistricting maps, which they allege constitute unconstitutional racial gerrymandering. This decision follows a recent U.S. Supreme Court ruling that imposed stricter standards for proving such claims. The lawsuit, initially dismissed by a three-judge panel, argued that the redistricting diluted the voting power of Black communities, particularly in Nashville and Shelby County. The plaintiffs, including the Tennessee State Conference of the NAACP and other organizations, emphasized the importance of voter participation in the upcoming elections, despite the setback in court. They are urging citizens to register and vote, highlighting Tennessee's low voter turnout rates. The lawsuit was significant as it was the first challenge to the state's congressional map, which critics claim was manipulated to favor Republican candidates. The plaintiffs expressed their commitment to combating discrimination and ensuring that marginalized voices are heard in the electoral process. Meanwhile, another lawsuit regarding the state legislative maps is set to be heard by the Tennessee Supreme Court, indicating ongoing legal battles over redistricting in the state.

Opinions

You've reached the end