Pentagon withdraws 1,350 National Guard members from Los Angeles
- The Pentagon has announced the withdrawal of 1,350 California National Guard members from Los Angeles.
- A remaining force of 250 National Guardsmen will continue to protect federal government buildings.
- This withdrawal reflects the ongoing debates over federal intervention in local protests.
In the United States, the Pentagon has initiated the withdrawal of 1,350 members of the California National Guard from their security mission in Los Angeles, which began in early June 2025. This mission was launched in response to escalating protests following immigration raids conducted by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) in the city. The initial deployment saw close to 5,000 National Guard members and Marines in Los Angeles in hopes of maintaining order during the wave of demonstrations erupting against federal actions. The mobilization was unusual because it was ordered by the Trump administration rather than by local government, specifically California Governor Gavin Newsom. While the Los Angeles Police Department and city officials deemed the deployment excessive and unnecessary since they believed they could manage the protests, the federalized nature of these National Guard and Marine personnel limited their capabilities. As per legal restrictions, they were prohibited from performing law enforcement duties directly, though they had the authority to temporarily detain individuals before handing them over to local law enforcement agencies. In the weeks following their deployment, the Pentagon also announced reductions in troops, reallocating some forces for different missions, including firefighting efforts, a move that further indicates the shifting focus of national resources and priorities. Ultimately, 250 National Guardsmen will remain in Los Angeles to continue protecting federal personnel and properties amidst ongoing concerns about public safety and order. This withdrawal not only marks the end of a controversial military presence but also underscores broader implications regarding federal-state relations and the balance of power concerning domestic security measures. The decision reflects the government's evolving response to civic unrest and the ongoing debates surrounding immigration policy and law enforcement practices in America.