Apr 10, 2025, 12:00 AM
Apr 7, 2025, 8:55 PM

Trump backs bills to limit judges and enforce voter ID requirements

Highlights
  • Two bills backed by President Donald Trump aim to limit judges' authority on a national scale and require proof of citizenship for voting.
  • The No Rogue Rulings Act seeks to restrict district judges from issuing nationwide injunctions, while the SAVE Act targets non-citizen voting.
  • Both bills will face a procedural vote before potentially moving to the Senate, signaling ongoing tensions between Trump's administration and the judiciary.
Story

In the United States, President Donald Trump is advancing his legislative agenda with the backing of two significant bills scheduled for a vote this week. The first, known as the No Rogue Rulings Act (NORRA Act), introduced by Representative Darrell Issa of California, seeks to restrict district court judges from issuing nationwide injunctions that block Trump administration policies. This bill aims to address what Trump and his allies perceive as a challenge to his presidency from federal judges, who have issued over 15 nationwide injunctions regarding various policies since Trump took office. The second piece of legislation, the Safeguarding American Voter Eligibility (SAVE) Act, led by Representative Chip Roy from Texas, proposes that proof of citizenship be mandatory for voter registration. This initiative has been a longstanding goal of Trump and his GOP supporters, reflecting an ongoing focus on election integrity and the belief that preventing non-citizen voting is crucial for fair elections. Both bills progressed through the House Rules Committee and are anticipated to receive votes in the House, with Issa's measure slated for Tuesday afternoon and Roy's for Thursday morning, contingent upon overcoming procedural hurdles. Trump's fight against the judiciary is a significant aspect of his administration's challenges. The No Rogue Rulings Act is seen as a retaliation against what Republicans describe as "rogue" judges whose injunctions stymie Trump's agenda. The bill has garnered substantial support among House Republicans, underscoring a collective frustration within the party regarding the consequences of judicial rulings that obstruct executive initiatives. Representative Issa expressed concern that the bill might not garner any Democratic support, highlighting the partisan divide over the judicial authority. As both bills head to the House floor for consideration, the narrative surrounding these legislative efforts illustrates the broader tensions between the judicial branch and the Trump administration. While the House is expected to pass these measures with relative ease, the Senate presents a more complex landscape. In the Senate, where a 60-vote threshold is necessary, these bills will likely require bipartisan support to advance, posing challenges in a body where negotiation and consensus are crucial for success.

Opinions

You've reached the end