Police cleared in fatal shooting of Wisconsin resident near GOP convention
- A Wisconsin prosecutor found no criminal liability for Columbus police officers in a fatal shooting incident.
- The shooting involved Samuel Sharpe, who approached another man brandishing knives, leading to police intervention.
- The incident raised concerns about police accountability and the use of force by out-of-state officers.
In Madison, Wisconsin, a significant legal determination was made regarding a fatal shooting incident that occurred in July 2024, during the Republican National Convention. The shooting involved police officers from Columbus, Ohio, who were in Milwaukee to ensure security surrounding the event. On July 16, the officers were gathered in a park near the convention site when they encountered Samuel Sharpe, a 43-year-old man wielding knives. Despite multiple warnings to drop his weapons, Sharpe lunged towards another individual, prompting the officers to open fire in what they believed was a necessary response to prevent imminent harm. The subsequent investigation was led by Milwaukee County District Attorney Kent Lovern, who reviewed the circumstances of the shooting. In his findings, Lovern stated that Wisconsin law permits the use of deadly force to avert imminent death or great bodily harm to another person. The officers' actions came under scrutiny because they were out-of-state law enforcement, raising concerns from local residents about police justifications for such use of force. Despite these concerns, Lovern concluded that the officers acted within the bounds of the law, clearing them of any criminal wrongdoing. Lovern's letter to the Columbus Division of Police emphasized the legal justification in this case, pointing to the officers' belief that Sharpe was intending to cause severe injury to the person he approached. Audio from body camera footage played a role in corroborating the officers' accounts, as they can be heard identifying themselves as police and issuing commands for Sharpe to drop his knives. The shooting itself, though occurring within a high-profile and politically charged environment, was determined to not be connected to the convention events. As this decision was announced, it raised broader discussions about out-of-state police involvement in local matters, the use of force, and accountability. It led to community reactions questioning how such incidents are handled, especially in sensitive situations where policing intersects with political events. With many officers deployed for additional security during the convention, the incident served to highlight ongoing debates over policing practices and their implications for community interactions, particularly in moments of heightened tension surrounding large gatherings.