Dario Amodei argues against AI regulation moratorium to thwart competition
- Dario Amodei, CEO of Anthropic, opposes a 10-year moratorium on AI regulation
- The proposal is part of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, which aims to block state-level regulations targeting AI
- Amodei's push raises concerns about protecting incumbents and stifling market entry for new competitors
In a guest essay published in The New York Times, Dario Amodei, the CEO of Anthropic, announced his opposition to a proposed 10-year moratorium on any state regulation targeting artificial intelligence in the United States. This proposal is part of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, which sought to prevent state-level actions against AI models or systems for a decade. Amodei’s call for regulation comes amid concern about potential cybersecurity issues and the risks of AI being misused, especially in creating harmful biological weapons. He emphasizes the importance of addressing both the benefits and dangers of AI technology. Critics question his motivations, suggesting that his push for regulation may serve to protect his company's interests by creating barriers for new entrants in the market. They point out that increased regulation could stifle innovation, ultimately hindering economic growth and technological advancements. Although some industry leaders, including Sam Altman of OpenAI, have also supported regulation, the potential for limiting competition raises significant concerns about maintaining a dynamic and innovative technological landscape. The debate thus centers around whether regulatory measures will genuinely enhance safety or merely protect established firms while disadvantaging emerging competitors.