Dec 3, 2024, 12:00 AM
Dec 3, 2024, 12:00 AM

Clubs and hotels oppose mandatory gambling accounts in NSW

Highlights
  • The NSW panel suggested implementing a mandatory account-based system for poker machines starting in 2028.
  • Industry groups challenged the validity of the research underpinning the recommendation, citing its limited data and lack of economic modeling.
  • The debate raises significant concerns about job stability in the gambling sector and the effectiveness of proposed reforms.
Story

In New South Wales, Australia, a government panel has recently recommended implementing a mandatory account-based gaming system for poker machines by the year 2028. This recommendation comes in response to concerns about anonymous gambling, which has been linked to issues such as money laundering. The panel, comprised of independent experts, suggests that by requiring gamblers to use accounts, the state can monitor activities more effectively and potentially reduce the billions of dollars believed to be laundered through clubs and pubs. However, industry groups including ClubsNSW and the Australian Hotels Association have expressed strong opposition to this plan. They argue that the research supporting this recommendation is flawed and lacks substantial evidence. During a trial of cashless gaming, participation was extremely low, with only 32 participants, leading to claims that the findings from this limited sample should not justify a mandatory rollout. Furthermore, industry representatives voiced concerns that such a change could result in significant job losses and venue closures across the state, with the potential for tens of thousands of jobs at risk if the scheme is enacted as recommended. The NSW government, led by Gaming Minister David Harris, has acknowledged the complexities of these recommendations and indicated that it will take time to formulate a response. In addition to the account-based system, some panel members have criticized the executive committee for not proposing changes to poker machine operating hours, despite evidence suggesting moderation could reduce gambling-related harm. Various social service organizations have called out this decision, emphasizing the need for stricter regulations to protect vulnerable gamblers. Overall, the ongoing debate highlights the tension between the gambling industry and public health advocates within New South Wales as they navigate the future of gaming reform in the state.

Opinions

You've reached the end