Swedish commission recommends halting international adoptions after fraud investigation
- A commissioned investigation in Sweden uncovered ongoing abuses and fraud in international adoptions spanning decades.
- The investigation found confirmed cases of child trafficking and irregularities in the adoption process from various countries.
- The commission called for a formal apology from the government to adoptees and their families, reflecting a commitment to acknowledge past injustices.
Sweden has come under scrutiny regarding its international adoption policies following an investigation by a commission formed in 2021. This commission was the result of a report by the Swedish newspaper Dagens Nyheter, which highlighted serious issues in the country's adoption system. During the investigation, evidence surfaced indicating that irregularities and unethical practices had been occurring over several decades, particularly concerning adoptions from countries such as South Korea, Sri Lanka, Colombia, Poland, and China. The commission's findings revealed confirmed cases of child trafficking from the 1970s through the 2000s, highlighting a pattern of illegal and unethical behavior in various actors involved in international adoptions, including governmental bodies and organizations. Anna Singer, the legal expert leading the commission, expressed the importance of understanding the pervasive nature of these irregularities, which included evidence like fabricated documentation and instances where children were wrongfully adopted under questionable circumstances. In light of the findings, the commission recommended that the Swedish government take accountability by formally apologizing to adoptees and their families, recognizing the injustices that occurred. The call for an apology has been emphasized as a crucial step in acknowledging the past and raising awareness about the violations that have been historically downplayed. Sweden is not alone in reevaluating its adoption policies in response to past abuses. Other countries, including France, Denmark, and the Netherlands, have also taken significant steps back from international adoptions after evaluating their roles and responsibilities in similar unethical practices surrounding adoptions. This collective reassessment highlights a growing awareness within the international adoption industry of the need for reform and accountability to prevent future injustices.